Roulette Wolfie Ladder version G - Last updated: October 8, 2026

79% win rate based on all 4,379 runs ( SEE results for more details )


I have made about 18 different versions of the Wolfie Ladder and have them all competing to see which is the best version. See the results page to see which is doing the best. When you go to lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/ the current winner is shown.

Version G is version F with stage 2 added. Stage 2 uses the same steps as version Z stage 2. The starting bank is 500 and the goal is 600. (basically 2 runs of the ladder ) Version Z is version Y, except the final stage bet amounts have changed and the number of steps changed from 7 down to 6 which i am coming to understand is the sweet spot for the win rate. also added waiting for the sequence to reset on step 28 .

There are 6 other versions of version Z that use this same system, with goals of winning $100, $200, $300, $400, $500, and $600. Winning $100 is Z2100, winning $200 is Z2200, winning $300 is Z2300, winning $400 is Z2400, winning $500 is Z2500, and winning $600 is Z2600. Counterintuitively, adding a 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials. Compounded probability increased about 3%, but the trials showed it did not work as well. When version G looses it usally feels like a crime because you have to loose 6+ times in row 2 times while playing which feels like lady luck is mad at you.

People keep misunderstanding what I actually built, so here is the truth in plain English: I am not a gambler — I am a programmer. I did not sit there playing 10,000 roulette games like some guy with a lucky rabbit foot. I wrote a program that runs the entire Wolfie Ladder — all 4 stages, all 28 steps — across 50 to 300 simultaneous games on a single page, and then I repeated that whole batch 10,000 times. That is how you get a real statistical picture. That is how you reach a ~90% win rate. Not vibes. Not superstition. Not “progressions” like Fibonacci that blow up the moment variance sneezes. The Wolfie Ladder is engineered to survive streaks, recover losses, and beat the distribution curve — and I tested it by running 10,000+ full sequences in under 30 minutes, not by hand playing one spin at a time. If people think I sat there clicking red/black like a zombie, they really do not understand who they are talking to. When i first made this system luck i guess was on my side because the first few hundred times i was playing it i was winning at a rate of 91% of the time but as i kept running it more and more times the win rate started to drop and now it is between ~83% and ~90% . And here’s the part people really don’t understand: the Wolfie Ladder wins even when the game‑level win rate is losing. For example — in one of the sequences, the system played 92 total games. Out of those:
38 wins
54 losses
Including a brutal streak where it lost every single bet from #52 through #67
That’s 16 consecutive losses in the middle of the run.
And despite that? Despite losing more games than it won? Despite eating a variance spike that would vaporize Fibonacci, Martingale, or any “pro gambler” strategy?
It still finished the sequence up +$100.
That’s the point. The Ladder doesn’t care about “win more than you lose.” It cares about sequence structure, distribution recovery, and controlled escalation. It’s engineered to survive streaks, absorb damage, and still exit the sequence profitable — even when the raw win/loss ratio looks terrible.
This is why the system works. This is why the win rate stabilizes around ~86.2%+ across 10,000 full trials. Not because it wins every spin — but because it wins the sequence. Other winning version of the wolfie ladder are version A, version B, version C, version D, and version X. version D has a win rate of 86.2% at 10,000 runs. version X has a win rate of 88.2% at 300 runs. ( it is new)



update 10/06/2026: changed first bet to be single dozen bets instead of 2 dozen bets see version H for having that be 2 dozen bets . updated the bank needed to reset to add 222 instead o f 300 at end of stage 2 as the bank needed at the end of stage 2 is a loss of 221 and the 222 is a angel number :)

THE WOLFIE LADDER SYSTEM (Step-by-Step)

CLICK HERE IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE REASONING BEHIND THESE STEPS
STAGE 1:
1️⃣ Bet $4 on the first dozen. If win → reset ladder, back to Step 1. If lose → Step 2. ( net win at this step is $8 )
2️⃣ Bet $6 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 3. ( net win at this step is $8 )
3️⃣ Bet $9 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 4. ( net win at this step is $8 )
4️⃣ Bet $13 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 5. ( net win at this step is $7 )
5️⃣ Bet $20 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 6. ( net win at this step is $8 )
6️⃣ Bet $30 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = current bank + 80, then Step 7. ( net win at this step is $8 )
7️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. A miss stays on Step 7. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8.
STAGE 2:
8️⃣ Bet $10 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 8. Lose → Step 9. ( net win at this step is $20 )
9️⃣ Bet $16 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 10. ( net win at this step is $22 )
🔟 Bet $24 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 11. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣1️⃣ Bet $36 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 12. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣2️⃣ Bet $54 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 13. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣3️⃣ Bet $81 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = 500, then Step 14. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣4️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. A miss stays on Step 14. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8.

Roulette wheel
This system was build using 80 diffent ai agents across 8 LLM models to test the best possible system for roulette using lupopedia AI platform.
The programmer captain wolfie (Eric) was too board playing just one game at a time so programmed this to play up to 500 games all at once, that way can play thousands of times a minute and find the best stratagy that holds up . .
Want the full story? Check out the Patreon post for the complete dialog between Captain Wolfie, Grok, and the mischievous Lilith!

Why my versions are A, B, C instead of major.minor.patch Because the traditional versioning system — major.minor.patch — is meaningless for what I’m doing here. I’m not shipping software releases. I’m iterating behavioral variants of a probability engine. Each version (A, B, C… all the way to ZZ if I want) represents a distinct ladder logic, a distinct recovery pattern, a distinct volatility profile, and a distinct mathematical personality. These aren’t “patches.” These aren’t “minor updates.” These are forks of logic. Version A behaves one way. Version B behaves another way. Version C might remove a step, add a step, rebalance a stage, or change the volatility curve entirely. Using semantic versioning (4.0.96, 4.0.97, etc.) would imply these are incremental changes to the same system — but they’re not. They’re parallel universes. So I use lettered versions because: They’re simple They’re human-readable They reflect behavior, not “patch level” They let me branch logic infinitely (A → B → C → … → Z → AA → AB → … → ZZ) They match how I actually think about the system In other words: Version A is a creature. Version B is a different creature. Version C is another creature. Letters make more sense for creatures than numbers.

Probability Reality Check

Steps 7 and 14 bet $0 and wait. A miss stays on that step. A hit returns to step 1 only when the bank is above bank_needed_to_reset. Otherwise the hit goes to step 8. Version Y is version H with the opening two-dozen bet of stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 converted to a single dozen bet. A dozen bet hits 12 of 38 numbers, about 31.58% of the time, and loses about 68.42% of the time. The six dozen bets before each wait fail about 10.26% of the time, so the sequence survives about 89.74% of the time. A 7th dozen bet would raise survival by about 3 percentage points, to about 92.98%. Counterintuitively, adding that 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials, so those stages stay at six bets. The house edge is still there. This is controlled exposure, not a guaranteed profit.

500-Round Simulation (American Wheel Model)

MySQL connected to collab52_salessyntax on localhost. This run was saved to wolfie_ladder_runs.

Every time this page loads it simulates 500 games using the WOLFIE Ladder exactly as defined here or stops if you win $100+ How did you do? If the run ended in the cliff, click here to try again and generate a fresh 500-game sequence. Saved runs are listed on wolfie_ladder_results.php.

Final Bank
600.00
Net Units
+100.00
Wins / Losses
78 / 117
Max Step Reached
14
Run Status
Target Hit
Table Limit Hit
No
Bank Depleted
No

Below is one 500-bet run. Each roll uses the real American wheel odds (12/38 for single dozen). Every time a win hits, we reset or loop based on rules.

# Bet Wheel Result Bank Next Step Mode
1 4 on first dozen 4 Win 508.00 1 Step 1
2 4 on first dozen 2 Win 516.00 1 Step 1
3 4 on first dozen 15 Loss 512.00 2 Step 1
4 6 on first dozen 12 Win 524.00 1 Step 2
5 4 on first dozen 6 Win 532.00 1 Step 1
6 4 on first dozen 10 Win 540.00 1 Step 1
7 4 on first dozen 10 Win 548.00 1 Step 1
8 4 on first dozen 17 Loss 544.00 2 Step 1
9 6 on first dozen 8 Win 556.00 1 Step 2
10 4 on first dozen 12 Win 564.00 1 Step 1
11 4 on first dozen 23 Loss 560.00 2 Step 1
12 6 on first dozen 36 Loss 554.00 3 Step 2
13 9 on first dozen 26 Loss 545.00 4 Step 3
14 13 on first dozen 26 Loss 532.00 5 Step 4
15 20 on first dozen 16 Loss 512.00 6 Step 5
16 30 on first dozen 27 Loss 482.00 7 Step 6
17 0 on first dozen 30 Loss 482.00 7 Step 7
18 0 on first dozen 19 Loss 482.00 7 Step 7
19 0 on first dozen 7 Win 482.00 8 Step 7
20 10 on first dozen 23 Loss 472.00 9 Step 8
21 16 on first dozen 8 Win 504.00 8 Step 9
22 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 494.00 9 Step 8
23 16 on first dozen 4 Win 526.00 8 Step 9
24 10 on first dozen 27 Loss 516.00 9 Step 8
25 16 on first dozen 1 Win 548.00 8 Step 9
26 10 on first dozen 21 Loss 538.00 9 Step 8
27 16 on first dozen 20 Loss 522.00 10 Step 9
28 24 on first dozen 15 Loss 498.00 11 Step 10
29 36 on first dozen 14 Loss 462.00 12 Step 11
30 54 on first dozen 24 Loss 408.00 13 Step 12
31 81 on first dozen 34 Loss 327.00 14 Step 13
32 0 on first dozen 23 Loss 327.00 14 Step 14
33 0 on first dozen 36 Loss 327.00 14 Step 14
34 0 on first dozen 7 Win 327.00 8 Step 14
35 10 on first dozen 10 Win 347.00 8 Step 8
36 10 on first dozen 1 Win 367.00 8 Step 8
37 10 on first dozen 12 Win 387.00 8 Step 8
38 10 on first dozen 23 Loss 377.00 9 Step 8
39 16 on first dozen 12 Win 409.00 8 Step 9
40 10 on first dozen 31 Loss 399.00 9 Step 8
41 16 on first dozen 12 Win 431.00 8 Step 9
42 10 on first dozen 6 Win 451.00 8 Step 8
43 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 441.00 9 Step 8
44 16 on first dozen 27 Loss 425.00 10 Step 9
45 24 on first dozen 15 Loss 401.00 11 Step 10
46 36 on first dozen 19 Loss 365.00 12 Step 11
47 54 on first dozen 19 Loss 311.00 13 Step 12
48 81 on first dozen 34 Loss 230.00 14 Step 13
49 0 on first dozen 10 Win 230.00 8 Step 14
50 10 on first dozen 30 Loss 220.00 9 Step 8
51 16 on first dozen 0 Loss 204.00 10 Step 9
52 24 on first dozen 9 Win 252.00 8 Step 10
53 10 on first dozen 12 Win 272.00 8 Step 8
54 10 on first dozen 17 Loss 262.00 9 Step 8
55 16 on first dozen 27 Loss 246.00 10 Step 9
56 24 on first dozen 31 Loss 222.00 11 Step 10
57 36 on first dozen 14 Loss 186.00 12 Step 11
58 54 on first dozen 32 Loss 132.00 13 Step 12
59 81 on first dozen 14 Loss 51.00 14 Step 13
60 0 on first dozen 5 Win 51.00 8 Step 14
61 10 on first dozen 5 Win 71.00 8 Step 8
62 10 on first dozen 4 Win 91.00 8 Step 8
63 10 on first dozen 10 Win 111.00 8 Step 8
64 10 on first dozen 16 Loss 101.00 9 Step 8
65 16 on first dozen 6 Win 133.00 8 Step 9
66 10 on first dozen 19 Loss 123.00 9 Step 8
67 16 on first dozen 8 Win 155.00 8 Step 9
68 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 145.00 9 Step 8
69 16 on first dozen 28 Loss 129.00 10 Step 9
70 24 on first dozen 32 Loss 105.00 11 Step 10
71 36 on first dozen 8 Win 177.00 8 Step 11
72 10 on first dozen 3 Win 197.00 8 Step 8
73 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 187.00 9 Step 8
74 16 on first dozen 9 Win 219.00 8 Step 9
75 10 on first dozen 10 Win 239.00 8 Step 8
76 10 on first dozen 6 Win 259.00 8 Step 8
77 10 on first dozen 34 Loss 249.00 9 Step 8
78 16 on first dozen 36 Loss 233.00 10 Step 9
79 24 on first dozen 4 Win 281.00 8 Step 10
80 10 on first dozen 00 Loss 271.00 9 Step 8
81 16 on first dozen 17 Loss 255.00 10 Step 9
82 24 on first dozen 6 Win 303.00 8 Step 10
83 10 on first dozen 10 Win 323.00 8 Step 8
84 10 on first dozen 5 Win 343.00 8 Step 8
85 10 on first dozen 27 Loss 333.00 9 Step 8
86 16 on first dozen 00 Loss 317.00 10 Step 9
87 24 on first dozen 27 Loss 293.00 11 Step 10
88 36 on first dozen 2 Win 365.00 8 Step 11
89 10 on first dozen 18 Loss 355.00 9 Step 8
90 16 on first dozen 4 Win 387.00 8 Step 9
91 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 377.00 9 Step 8
92 16 on first dozen 0 Loss 361.00 10 Step 9
93 24 on first dozen 4 Win 409.00 8 Step 10
94 10 on first dozen 17 Loss 399.00 9 Step 8
95 16 on first dozen 30 Loss 383.00 10 Step 9
96 24 on first dozen 26 Loss 359.00 11 Step 10
97 36 on first dozen 6 Win 431.00 8 Step 11
98 10 on first dozen 24 Loss 421.00 9 Step 8
99 16 on first dozen 23 Loss 405.00 10 Step 9
100 24 on first dozen 20 Loss 381.00 11 Step 10
101 36 on first dozen 30 Loss 345.00 12 Step 11
102 54 on first dozen 2 Win 453.00 8 Step 12
103 10 on first dozen 6 Win 473.00 8 Step 8
104 10 on first dozen 4 Win 493.00 8 Step 8
105 10 on first dozen 27 Loss 483.00 9 Step 8
106 16 on first dozen 24 Loss 467.00 10 Step 9
107 24 on first dozen 23 Loss 443.00 11 Step 10
108 36 on first dozen 18 Loss 407.00 12 Step 11
109 54 on first dozen 16 Loss 353.00 13 Step 12
110 81 on first dozen 26 Loss 272.00 14 Step 13
111 0 on first dozen 4 Win 272.00 8 Step 14
112 10 on first dozen 6 Win 292.00 8 Step 8
113 10 on first dozen 25 Loss 282.00 9 Step 8
114 16 on first dozen 7 Win 314.00 8 Step 9
115 10 on first dozen 6 Win 334.00 8 Step 8
116 10 on first dozen 2 Win 354.00 8 Step 8
117 10 on first dozen 29 Loss 344.00 9 Step 8
118 16 on first dozen 35 Loss 328.00 10 Step 9
119 24 on first dozen 26 Loss 304.00 11 Step 10
120 36 on first dozen 1 Win 376.00 8 Step 11
121 10 on first dozen 10 Win 396.00 8 Step 8
122 10 on first dozen 15 Loss 386.00 9 Step 8
123 16 on first dozen 5 Win 418.00 8 Step 9
124 10 on first dozen 34 Loss 408.00 9 Step 8
125 16 on first dozen 36 Loss 392.00 10 Step 9
126 24 on first dozen 35 Loss 368.00 11 Step 10
127 36 on first dozen 17 Loss 332.00 12 Step 11
128 54 on first dozen 1 Win 440.00 8 Step 12
129 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 430.00 9 Step 8
130 16 on first dozen 11 Win 462.00 8 Step 9
131 10 on first dozen 17 Loss 452.00 9 Step 8
132 16 on first dozen 8 Win 484.00 8 Step 9
133 10 on first dozen 1 Win 504.00 1 Step 8
134 4 on first dozen 27 Loss 500.00 2 Step 1
135 6 on first dozen 11 Win 512.00 1 Step 2
136 4 on first dozen 20 Loss 508.00 2 Step 1
137 6 on first dozen 5 Win 520.00 1 Step 2
138 4 on first dozen 4 Win 528.00 1 Step 1
139 4 on first dozen 17 Loss 524.00 2 Step 1
140 6 on first dozen 29 Loss 518.00 3 Step 2
141 9 on first dozen 20 Loss 509.00 4 Step 3
142 13 on first dozen 4 Win 535.00 1 Step 4
143 4 on first dozen 31 Loss 531.00 2 Step 1
144 6 on first dozen 27 Loss 525.00 3 Step 2
145 9 on first dozen 8 Win 543.00 1 Step 3
146 4 on first dozen 20 Loss 539.00 2 Step 1
147 6 on first dozen 2 Win 551.00 1 Step 2
148 4 on first dozen 33 Loss 547.00 2 Step 1
149 6 on first dozen 35 Loss 541.00 3 Step 2
150 9 on first dozen 00 Loss 532.00 4 Step 3
151 13 on first dozen 2 Win 558.00 1 Step 4
152 4 on first dozen 35 Loss 554.00 2 Step 1
153 6 on first dozen 16 Loss 548.00 3 Step 2
154 9 on first dozen 29 Loss 539.00 4 Step 3
155 13 on first dozen 28 Loss 526.00 5 Step 4
156 20 on first dozen 29 Loss 506.00 6 Step 5
157 30 on first dozen 22 Loss 476.00 7 Step 6
158 0 on first dozen 24 Loss 476.00 7 Step 7
159 0 on first dozen 19 Loss 476.00 7 Step 7
160 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 476.00 7 Step 7
161 0 on first dozen 31 Loss 476.00 7 Step 7
162 0 on first dozen 1 Win 476.00 8 Step 7
163 10 on first dozen 8 Win 496.00 8 Step 8
164 10 on first dozen 12 Win 516.00 8 Step 8
165 10 on first dozen 14 Loss 506.00 9 Step 8
166 16 on first dozen 35 Loss 490.00 10 Step 9
167 24 on first dozen 4 Win 538.00 8 Step 10
168 10 on first dozen 2 Win 558.00 1 Step 8
169 4 on first dozen 28 Loss 554.00 2 Step 1
170 6 on first dozen 1 Win 566.00 1 Step 2
171 4 on first dozen 18 Loss 562.00 2 Step 1
172 6 on first dozen 35 Loss 556.00 3 Step 2
173 9 on first dozen 24 Loss 547.00 4 Step 3
174 13 on first dozen 29 Loss 534.00 5 Step 4
175 20 on first dozen 27 Loss 514.00 6 Step 5
176 30 on first dozen 00 Loss 484.00 7 Step 6
177 0 on first dozen 7 Win 484.00 8 Step 7
178 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 474.00 9 Step 8
179 16 on first dozen 35 Loss 458.00 10 Step 9
180 24 on first dozen 35 Loss 434.00 11 Step 10
181 36 on first dozen 19 Loss 398.00 12 Step 11
182 54 on first dozen 9 Win 506.00 8 Step 12
183 10 on first dozen 3 Win 526.00 8 Step 8
184 10 on first dozen 6 Win 546.00 8 Step 8
185 10 on first dozen 34 Loss 536.00 9 Step 8
186 16 on first dozen 2 Win 568.00 1 Step 9
187 4 on first dozen 2 Win 576.00 1 Step 1
188 4 on first dozen 10 Win 584.00 1 Step 1
189 4 on first dozen 29 Loss 580.00 2 Step 1
190 6 on first dozen 13 Loss 574.00 3 Step 2
191 9 on first dozen 16 Loss 565.00 4 Step 3
192 13 on first dozen 21 Loss 552.00 5 Step 4
193 20 on first dozen 18 Loss 532.00 6 Step 5
194 30 on first dozen 10 Win 592.00 1 Step 6
195 4 on first dozen 9 Win 600.00 1 Step 1

Probability Reality Check

To understand the logic behind my system, I first need to explain what I call the gambling crimes against statistics and probability math that most online “systems” commit. Take the Fibonacci sequence used for dozen bets — the classic 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55… progression. Beautiful in nature, great for sunflowers, terrible for roulette.

The Core Probability Error

A standard dozen bet covers 12 numbers on an American wheel (38 pockets). So the true win probability is:

12/38 = 31.58% win

26/38 = 68.42% loss

This probability never changes, even after 20 losses. The wheel has no memory. If you track every 21st bet after a 20‑loss streak, the win rate still converges to 31.58%. (and Brah I actually have done this)

Compounded Probability vs. Changing Odds

People confuse compounded probability with changing odds. They are not the same.

Each spin still has a 68.42% chance of losing, but the probability of losing multiple times in a row compounds:

After about seven losses, the absolute drop per step becomes small, but the next spin is still 31.58% to win. Restarting the sequence does not change the odds; it only changes your bankroll exposure. Also, after building many versions of this system, I found something counterintuitive. Stopping at step six and then resetting the sequence consistently performed about three to four percent better than continuing to step seven. Even though reaching step seven is only about a one‑in‑ten event, stacking four or five of those one‑in‑ten chances ends up being stronger than pushing the ladder all the way to step seven.

The Fibonacci Net‑Win Trap

As you climb the Fibonacci ladder, your bet size increases — but your net win target also increases, even though the odds never improve.

Using the first 9 Fibonacci bets (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34) with a 2:1 dozen payout:

But every one of those bets still wins 31.58% of the time.

Why this is mathematically stupid

Correct Comparison: Even‑Money vs. Dozen Bets

Even‑Money (red/black)

Compounded losses:

By the 5th bet, you’ve already lost more than you can realistically win back.

Dozen Bets

Compounded losses:

The Real Trade‑Off

A correct dozen‑based system would:

Bottom Line

Also I have a system that wins $100 in sequences of bets 90% of the time so, again, respectfully:

variance can Suck it.

👉 Wolfie Ladder: https://lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/