Roulette Wolfie Ladder version M2400 - Last updated: October 9, 2026

78% win rate based on all 37 runs ( SEE results for more details )


I have made about 22 different versions of the Wolfie Ladder and have them all competing to see which is the best version. See the results page to see which is doing the best. When you go to lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/ the current winner is shown.

Version M2400 is version M2100 with the goal raised to 2400. It still starts at stage 2, step 8, and a full reset returns to step 8. which i am coming to understand is the sweet spot for the win rate. also added waiting for the sequence to reset on step 28 . Counterintuitively, adding a 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials. Compounded probability increased about 3%, but the trials showed it did not work as well. When version M2400 looses it usally feels like a crime because you have to loose 6+ times in row 6 different times while playing which feels like lady luck is mad at you.

There are 6 other versions of version M that use this same system, with goals of winning $100, $200, $300, $400, $500, and $600. Winning $100 is M2100, winning $200 is M2200, winning $300 is M2300, winning $400 is M2400, winning $500 is M2500, and winning $600 is M2600.

There is a version where we try to win $100 with only 500 starting bank see version G for more details.

People keep misunderstanding what I actually built, so here is the truth in plain English: I am not a gambler — I am a programmer. I did not sit there playing 10,000 roulette games like some guy with a lucky rabbit foot. I wrote a program that runs the entire Wolfie Ladder — all 4 stages, all 28 steps — across 50 to 300 simultaneous games on a single page, and then I repeated that whole batch 10,000 times. That is how you get a real statistical picture. That is how you reach a ~90% win rate. Not vibes. Not superstition. Not “progressions” like Fibonacci that blow up the moment variance sneezes. The Wolfie Ladder is engineered to survive streaks, recover losses, and beat the distribution curve — and I tested it by running 10,000+ full sequences in under 30 minutes, not by hand playing one spin at a time. If people think I sat there clicking red/black like a zombie, they really do not understand who they are talking to. When i first made this system luck i guess was on my side because the first few hundred times i was playing it i was winning at a rate of 91% of the time but as i kept running it more and more times the win rate started to drop and now it is between ~83% and ~90% . And here’s the part people really don’t understand: the Wolfie Ladder wins even when the game‑level win rate is losing. For example — in one of the sequences, the system played 92 total games. Out of those:
38 wins
54 losses
Including a brutal streak where it lost every single bet from #52 through #67
That’s 16 consecutive losses in the middle of the run.
And despite that? Despite losing more games than it won? Despite eating a variance spike that would vaporize Fibonacci, Martingale, or any “pro gambler” strategy?
It still finished the sequence up +$100.
That’s the point. The Ladder doesn’t care about “win more than you lose.” It cares about sequence structure, distribution recovery, and controlled escalation. It’s engineered to survive streaks, absorb damage, and still exit the sequence profitable — even when the raw win/loss ratio looks terrible.
This is why the system works. This is why the win rate stabilizes around ~86.2%+ across 10,000 full trials. Not because it wins every spin — but because it wins the sequence. Other winning version of the wolfie ladder are version A, version B, version C, version D, and version X. version D has a win rate of 86.2% at 10,000 runs. version X has a win rate of 88.2% at 300 runs. ( it is new)



update 10/06/2026: changed first bet to be single dozen bets instead of 2 dozen bets see version H for having that be 2 dozen bets . the bank needed to reset adds 200 at the end of stage 2.

THE WOLFIE LADDER SYSTEM (Step-by-Step)

CLICK HERE IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE REASONING BEHIND THESE STEPS
STAGE 2:
8️⃣ Bet $10 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 8. Lose → Step 9. ( net win at this step is $20 )
9️⃣ Bet $16 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 10. ( net win at this step is $22 )
🔟 Bet $24 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 11. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣1️⃣ Bet $36 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 12. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣2️⃣ Bet $54 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 13. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣3️⃣ Bet $81 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = current bank + 200, then Step 14. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣4️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. This is a sequence reset, not a progression bet. The next bets are a new sequence, and that sequence has to start over before it counts. Win → Step 15. A miss stays on Step 14.
STAGE 3:
1️⃣5️⃣ Bet $25 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 15. Lose → Step 16. ( net win at this step is $50 )
1️⃣6️⃣ Bet $40 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 17. ( net win at this step is $55 )
1️⃣7️⃣ Bet $60 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 18. ( net win at this step is $55 )
1️⃣8️⃣ Bet $90 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 19. ( net win at this step is $55 )
1️⃣9️⃣ Bet $130 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 20. ( net win at this step is $45 )
2️⃣0️⃣ Bet $200 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset to halfway to the goal, then Step 21. ( net win at this step is $15 )
2️⃣1️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. This is a sequence reset, not a progression bet. The next bets are a new sequence, and that sequence has to start over before it counts. Win → Step 22. A miss stays on Step 21.
STAGE 4:
2️⃣2️⃣ Bet $50 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 22. Lose → Step 23. ( net win at this step is $100 )
2️⃣3️⃣ Bet $75 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 22. Lose → Step 24. ( net win at this step is $100 )
2️⃣4️⃣ Bet $100 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 22. Lose → Step 25. ( net win at this step is $75 )
2️⃣5️⃣ Bet $150 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 22. Lose → Step 26. ( net win at this step is $25 )
2️⃣6️⃣ Bet $200 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 22. Lose → Step 27. ( net win at this step is $0 )
2️⃣7️⃣ Bet $250 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 22. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset to the starting bank, then Step 28. ( net win at this step is $-75 )
2️⃣8️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. This is a sequence reset, not a progression bet. The next bets are a new sequence, and that sequence has to start over before it counts. Win → Step 21. A miss stays on Step 28.

Roulette wheel
This system was build using 80 diffent ai agents across 8 LLM models to test the best possible system for roulette using lupopedia AI platform.
The programmer captain wolfie (Eric) was too board playing just one game at a time so programmed this to play up to 1000 games all at once, that way can play thousands of times a minute and find the best stratagy that holds up . .
Want the full story? Check out the Patreon post for the complete dialog between Captain Wolfie, Grok, and the mischievous Lilith!

Why my versions are A, B, C instead of major.minor.patch Because the traditional versioning system — major.minor.patch — is meaningless for what I’m doing here. I’m not shipping software releases. I’m iterating behavioral variants of a probability engine. Each version (A, B, C… all the way to ZZ if I want) represents a distinct ladder logic, a distinct recovery pattern, a distinct volatility profile, and a distinct mathematical personality. These aren’t “patches.” These aren’t “minor updates.” These are forks of logic. Version A behaves one way. Version B behaves another way. Version C might remove a step, add a step, rebalance a stage, or change the volatility curve entirely. Using semantic versioning (4.0.96, 4.0.97, etc.) would imply these are incremental changes to the same system — but they’re not. They’re parallel universes. So I use lettered versions because: They’re simple They’re human-readable They reflect behavior, not “patch level” They let me branch logic infinitely (A → B → C → … → Z → AA → AB → … → ZZ) They match how I actually think about the system In other words: Version A is a creature. Version B is a different creature. Version C is another creature. Letters make more sense for creatures than numbers.

Probability Reality Check

This version starts at stage 2. Steps 14, 21, and 28 bet $0 and wait for the first dozen to hit. A miss stays on that step. A hit on step 14 starts stage 3. A hit on step 21 starts stage 4. A hit on step 28 goes to step 21. A full reset returns to step 8. Version Y is version H with the opening two-dozen bet of stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 converted to a single dozen bet. A dozen bet hits 12 of 38 numbers, about 31.58% of the time, and loses about 68.42% of the time. The six dozen bets before each wait fail about 10.26% of the time, so the sequence survives about 89.74% of the time. A 7th dozen bet would raise survival by about 3 percentage points, to about 92.98%. Counterintuitively, adding that 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials, so those stages stay at six bets. The house edge is still there. This is controlled exposure, not a guaranteed profit.

1000-Round Simulation (American Wheel Model)

MySQL connected to collab52_salessyntax on localhost. This run was saved to wolfie_ladder_runs.

Every time this page loads it simulates 1000 games using the WOLFIE Ladder exactly as defined here or stops if you win $400+ How did you do? If the run ended in the cliff, click here to try again and generate a fresh 1000-game sequence. Saved runs are listed on wolfie_ladder_results.php.

Final Bank
2,416.00
Net Units
+416.00
Wins / Losses
54 / 111
Max Step Reached
28
Run Status
Target Hit
Table Limit Hit
No
Bank Depleted
No

Below is one 1000-bet run. Each roll uses the real American wheel odds (12/38 for single dozen). Every time a win hits, we reset or loop based on rules.

# Bet Wheel Result Bank Next Step Mode
1 10 on first dozen 14 Loss 1,990.00 9 Step 8
2 16 on first dozen 34 Loss 1,974.00 10 Step 9
3 24 on first dozen 8 Win 2,022.00 8 Step 10
4 10 on first dozen 0 Loss 2,012.00 9 Step 8
5 16 on first dozen 22 Loss 1,996.00 10 Step 9
6 24 on first dozen 35 Loss 1,972.00 11 Step 10
7 36 on first dozen 13 Loss 1,936.00 12 Step 11
8 54 on first dozen 15 Loss 1,882.00 13 Step 12
9 81 on first dozen 00 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 13
10 0 on first dozen 22 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
11 0 on first dozen 16 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
12 0 on first dozen 17 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
13 0 on first dozen 34 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
14 0 on first dozen 18 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
15 0 on first dozen 16 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
16 0 on first dozen 22 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
17 0 on first dozen 31 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
18 0 on first dozen 15 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
19 0 on first dozen 13 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
20 0 on first dozen 13 Loss 1,801.00 14 Step 14
21 0 on first dozen 11 Win 1,801.00 15 Step 14
22 25 on first dozen 3 Win 1,851.00 15 Step 15
23 25 on first dozen 12 Win 1,901.00 15 Step 15
24 25 on first dozen 18 Loss 1,876.00 16 Step 15
25 40 on first dozen 29 Loss 1,836.00 17 Step 16
26 60 on first dozen 35 Loss 1,776.00 18 Step 17
27 90 on first dozen 16 Loss 1,686.00 19 Step 18
28 130 on first dozen 25 Loss 1,556.00 20 Step 19
29 200 on first dozen 13 Loss 1,356.00 21 Step 20
30 0 on first dozen 12 Win 1,356.00 22 Step 21
31 50 on first dozen 32 Loss 1,306.00 23 Step 22
32 75 on first dozen 3 Win 1,456.00 22 Step 23
33 50 on first dozen 13 Loss 1,406.00 23 Step 22
34 75 on first dozen 34 Loss 1,331.00 24 Step 23
35 100 on first dozen 32 Loss 1,231.00 25 Step 24
36 150 on first dozen 35 Loss 1,081.00 26 Step 25
37 200 on first dozen 18 Loss 881.00 27 Step 26
38 250 on first dozen 17 Loss 631.00 28 Step 27
39 0 on first dozen 27 Loss 631.00 28 Step 28
40 0 on first dozen 5 Win 631.00 22 Step 28
41 50 on first dozen 36 Loss 581.00 23 Step 22
42 75 on first dozen 3 Win 731.00 22 Step 23
43 50 on first dozen 13 Loss 681.00 23 Step 22
44 75 on first dozen 26 Loss 606.00 24 Step 23
45 100 on first dozen 34 Loss 506.00 25 Step 24
46 150 on first dozen 19 Loss 356.00 26 Step 25
47 200 on first dozen 2 Win 756.00 22 Step 26
48 50 on first dozen 2 Win 856.00 22 Step 22
49 50 on first dozen 4 Win 956.00 22 Step 22
50 50 on first dozen 21 Loss 906.00 23 Step 22
51 75 on first dozen 21 Loss 831.00 24 Step 23
52 100 on first dozen 8 Win 1,031.00 22 Step 24
53 50 on first dozen 6 Win 1,131.00 22 Step 22
54 50 on first dozen 32 Loss 1,081.00 23 Step 22
55 75 on first dozen 9 Win 1,231.00 22 Step 23
56 50 on first dozen 33 Loss 1,181.00 23 Step 22
57 75 on first dozen 15 Loss 1,106.00 24 Step 23
58 100 on first dozen 30 Loss 1,006.00 25 Step 24
59 150 on first dozen 15 Loss 856.00 26 Step 25
60 200 on first dozen 7 Win 1,256.00 22 Step 26
61 50 on first dozen 27 Loss 1,206.00 23 Step 22
62 75 on first dozen 25 Loss 1,131.00 24 Step 23
63 100 on first dozen 21 Loss 1,031.00 25 Step 24
64 150 on first dozen 20 Loss 881.00 26 Step 25
65 200 on first dozen 4 Win 1,281.00 22 Step 26
66 50 on first dozen 21 Loss 1,231.00 23 Step 22
67 75 on first dozen 1 Win 1,381.00 22 Step 23
68 50 on first dozen 12 Win 1,481.00 22 Step 22
69 50 on first dozen 6 Win 1,581.00 22 Step 22
70 50 on first dozen 0 Loss 1,531.00 23 Step 22
71 75 on first dozen 21 Loss 1,456.00 24 Step 23
72 100 on first dozen 22 Loss 1,356.00 25 Step 24
73 150 on first dozen 0 Loss 1,206.00 26 Step 25
74 200 on first dozen 36 Loss 1,006.00 27 Step 26
75 250 on first dozen 35 Loss 756.00 28 Step 27
76 0 on first dozen 12 Win 756.00 22 Step 28
77 50 on first dozen 23 Loss 706.00 23 Step 22
78 75 on first dozen 3 Win 856.00 22 Step 23
79 50 on first dozen 12 Win 956.00 22 Step 22
80 50 on first dozen 14 Loss 906.00 23 Step 22
81 75 on first dozen 1 Win 1,056.00 22 Step 23
82 50 on first dozen 5 Win 1,156.00 22 Step 22
83 50 on first dozen 3 Win 1,256.00 22 Step 22
84 50 on first dozen 28 Loss 1,206.00 23 Step 22
85 75 on first dozen 3 Win 1,356.00 22 Step 23
86 50 on first dozen 15 Loss 1,306.00 23 Step 22
87 75 on first dozen 1 Win 1,456.00 22 Step 23
88 50 on first dozen 8 Win 1,556.00 22 Step 22
89 50 on first dozen 15 Loss 1,506.00 23 Step 22
90 75 on first dozen 27 Loss 1,431.00 24 Step 23
91 100 on first dozen 12 Win 1,631.00 22 Step 24
92 50 on first dozen 21 Loss 1,581.00 23 Step 22
93 75 on first dozen 6 Win 1,731.00 22 Step 23
94 50 on first dozen 28 Loss 1,681.00 23 Step 22
95 75 on first dozen 13 Loss 1,606.00 24 Step 23
96 100 on first dozen 25 Loss 1,506.00 25 Step 24
97 150 on first dozen 0 Loss 1,356.00 26 Step 25
98 200 on first dozen 00 Loss 1,156.00 27 Step 26
99 250 on first dozen 12 Win 1,656.00 22 Step 27
100 50 on first dozen 7 Win 1,756.00 22 Step 22
101 50 on first dozen 32 Loss 1,706.00 23 Step 22
102 75 on first dozen 30 Loss 1,631.00 24 Step 23
103 100 on first dozen 9 Win 1,831.00 22 Step 24
104 50 on first dozen 9 Win 1,931.00 22 Step 22
105 50 on first dozen 23 Loss 1,881.00 23 Step 22
106 75 on first dozen 15 Loss 1,806.00 24 Step 23
107 100 on first dozen 3 Win 2,006.00 8 Step 24
108 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 1,996.00 9 Step 8
109 16 on first dozen 20 Loss 1,980.00 10 Step 9
110 24 on first dozen 18 Loss 1,956.00 11 Step 10
111 36 on first dozen 20 Loss 1,920.00 12 Step 11
112 54 on first dozen 23 Loss 1,866.00 13 Step 12
113 81 on first dozen 4 Win 2,028.00 8 Step 13
114 10 on first dozen 3 Win 2,048.00 8 Step 8
115 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 2,038.00 9 Step 8
116 16 on first dozen 16 Loss 2,022.00 10 Step 9
117 24 on first dozen 8 Win 2,070.00 8 Step 10
118 10 on first dozen 2 Win 2,090.00 8 Step 8
119 10 on first dozen 16 Loss 2,080.00 9 Step 8
120 16 on first dozen 2 Win 2,112.00 8 Step 9
121 10 on first dozen 30 Loss 2,102.00 9 Step 8
122 16 on first dozen 20 Loss 2,086.00 10 Step 9
123 24 on first dozen 8 Win 2,134.00 8 Step 10
124 10 on first dozen 16 Loss 2,124.00 9 Step 8
125 16 on first dozen 00 Loss 2,108.00 10 Step 9
126 24 on first dozen 4 Win 2,156.00 8 Step 10
127 10 on first dozen 17 Loss 2,146.00 9 Step 8
128 16 on first dozen 18 Loss 2,130.00 10 Step 9
129 24 on first dozen 13 Loss 2,106.00 11 Step 10
130 36 on first dozen 30 Loss 2,070.00 12 Step 11
131 54 on first dozen 8 Win 2,178.00 8 Step 12
132 10 on first dozen 15 Loss 2,168.00 9 Step 8
133 16 on first dozen 00 Loss 2,152.00 10 Step 9
134 24 on first dozen 2 Win 2,200.00 8 Step 10
135 10 on first dozen 36 Loss 2,190.00 9 Step 8
136 16 on first dozen 14 Loss 2,174.00 10 Step 9
137 24 on first dozen 7 Win 2,222.00 8 Step 10
138 10 on first dozen 20 Loss 2,212.00 9 Step 8
139 16 on first dozen 29 Loss 2,196.00 10 Step 9
140 24 on first dozen 6 Win 2,244.00 8 Step 10
141 10 on first dozen 21 Loss 2,234.00 9 Step 8
142 16 on first dozen 33 Loss 2,218.00 10 Step 9
143 24 on first dozen 11 Win 2,266.00 8 Step 10
144 10 on first dozen 24 Loss 2,256.00 9 Step 8
145 16 on first dozen 26 Loss 2,240.00 10 Step 9
146 24 on first dozen 23 Loss 2,216.00 11 Step 10
147 36 on first dozen 6 Win 2,288.00 8 Step 11
148 10 on first dozen 27 Loss 2,278.00 9 Step 8
149 16 on first dozen 18 Loss 2,262.00 10 Step 9
150 24 on first dozen 31 Loss 2,238.00 11 Step 10
151 36 on first dozen 22 Loss 2,202.00 12 Step 11
152 54 on first dozen 9 Win 2,310.00 8 Step 12
153 10 on first dozen 28 Loss 2,300.00 9 Step 8
154 16 on first dozen 31 Loss 2,284.00 10 Step 9
155 24 on first dozen 8 Win 2,332.00 8 Step 10
156 10 on first dozen 6 Win 2,352.00 8 Step 8
157 10 on first dozen 0 Loss 2,342.00 9 Step 8
158 16 on first dozen 28 Loss 2,326.00 10 Step 9
159 24 on first dozen 26 Loss 2,302.00 11 Step 10
160 36 on first dozen 19 Loss 2,266.00 12 Step 11
161 54 on first dozen 12 Win 2,374.00 8 Step 12
162 10 on first dozen 9 Win 2,394.00 8 Step 8
163 10 on first dozen 0 Loss 2,384.00 9 Step 8
164 16 on first dozen 34 Loss 2,368.00 10 Step 9
165 24 on first dozen 3 Win 2,416.00 8 Step 10

Probability Reality Check

To understand the logic behind my system, I first need to explain what I call the gambling crimes against statistics and probability math that most online “systems” commit. Take the Fibonacci sequence used for dozen bets — the classic 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55… progression. Beautiful in nature, great for sunflowers, terrible for roulette.

The Core Probability Error

A standard dozen bet covers 12 numbers on an American wheel (38 pockets). So the true win probability is:

12/38 = 31.58% win

26/38 = 68.42% loss

This probability never changes, even after 20 losses. The wheel has no memory. If you track every 21st bet after a 20‑loss streak, the win rate still converges to 31.58%. (and Brah I actually have done this)

Compounded Probability vs. Changing Odds

People confuse compounded probability with changing odds. They are not the same.

Each spin still has a 68.42% chance of losing, but the probability of losing multiple times in a row compounds:

After about seven losses, the absolute drop per step becomes small, but the next spin is still 31.58% to win. Restarting the sequence does not change the odds; it only changes your bankroll exposure. Also, after building many versions of this system, I found something counterintuitive. Stopping at step six and then resetting the sequence consistently performed about three to four percent better than continuing to step seven. Even though reaching step seven is only about a one‑in‑ten event, stacking four or five of those one‑in‑ten chances ends up being stronger than pushing the ladder all the way to step seven.

The Fibonacci Net‑Win Trap

As you climb the Fibonacci ladder, your bet size increases — but your net win target also increases, even though the odds never improve.

Using the first 9 Fibonacci bets (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34) with a 2:1 dozen payout:

But every one of those bets still wins 31.58% of the time.

Why this is mathematically stupid

Correct Comparison: Even‑Money vs. Dozen Bets

Even‑Money (red/black)

Compounded losses:

By the 5th bet, you’ve already lost more than you can realistically win back.

Dozen Bets

Compounded losses:

The Real Trade‑Off

A correct dozen‑based system would:

Bottom Line

Also I have a system that wins $100 in sequences of bets 90% of the time so, again, respectfully:

variance can Suck it.

👉 Wolfie Ladder: https://lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/